Pro’s and Con's

Here is a summary of Pro’s and Con’s of houses from Tik Tok:

The "Top Tier" Sororities

These are generally considered the most sought-after and competitive.

Pi Beta Phi (Pi Phi) Often ranked #1. Known for a tight sisterhood, wealth, and beautiful facilities. They're very social and loved by many fraternities, but their house is a bit far from campus. Pros: Huge, beautiful house; strong sisterhood. Cons: Location.

|
Alpha Phi (A Phi) Highly social and seen as a top-tier party house. Members are often described as outgoing and "hot," and they have a massive social presence.
Pros: Extremely social; great location. Cons: Can be cliquey; some say sisterhood is less genuine.

Delta Gamma (DG) A mix of "smart and cute" girls. They have a "girl next door" feel, are well-respected, and get along with other houses. Their house is historic and cute but on the smaller side. Pros: Great location; decent sisterhood. Cons: Smaller, older house. |

The "Mid-Tier" Contenders

These are often praised for their genuine sisterhood and strong sense of community.

Chi Omega (Chi O) Cool, unique, and "natural" girls. They're more school-focused than the top tiers but still fun. They throw popular events, like a mini carnival in the fall. Pros: Fun events; beautiful location. Cons: Lost some of their past top-tier status.

Alpha Chi Omega (AXO) Ranked as a fast-rising mid-tier house. Members highlight its genuine sisterhood, a good mix of personalities, and a strong focus on academics and philanthropy. Pros: Top location; improving chapter. Cons: Can have internal issues; some social stereotypes.

Kappa Kappa Gamma (Kappa) A very social house that's obsessed with its image. They can be seen as "social climbers" who focus heavily on boys and parties. Pros: Stunning, huge house. Cons: Dues are high; sisterhood can be strained.

Theta Outdoorsy, smart, and chill. They're less "sorority-girl" stereotyped and have a strong sisterhood. Their location is a bit off the main "hill" but near campus. Pros: Great sisterhood; active in philanthropy. Cons: Location; less of a "reputation."