If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
lmaoo

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />Propaganda I AM falling for: panhell love<br /><br /> Poster Message:
I’m just sitting back in disbelief over the utter nonsense spewed on this site. Every single Panhell chapter does COB (if you say otherwise, you’re flat-out lying). Girls graduate early, transfer to different schools midway through the year, or drop for personal/financial reasons in EVERY house. COB makes sense so chapters have strong numbers for fall, housing, philo events, and steady dues to pay for everything Acting like COB affects a chapter’s “ranking” is laughable. PNMs should base their own rankings on things that actually matter: strength of the sisterhood, whether they vibe/connect personality-wise with members, their passion/personal connection to the philo, relations with other Greek orgs, academics, or housing if that’s important to them. Each PNM will prioritize differently, which means “top tier” is completely subjective If someone values a close-knit sisterhood, certain houses will be “top tier” for them. If they value frat relations and parties, other houses will be “top.” If they care about academics or a specific cause, different houses will be “top.” There is no single objective ranking, but it seems like GreekRank only judges based on what frats think (chapters w the most good-looking girls per capita and whether those girls will party hard/put out). Why are chapters fighting for a “top” spot based on that? Instead, chapters should all be seen as equals but recognized for what they bring to the table. Each has a philanthropic focus and a set of positive stereotypes. Some houses are known for being outgoing and social, academic and driven, athletic and competitive, artistic and creative, edgy and alternative, nurturing and sisterhood-focused, philanthropic and service-oriented. None of these qualities are better than the others, they just appeal to different PNMs depending on what they value. That is how it should be, not this fake hierarchy I’m so sick of this tired idea that you don’t get the “real sorority experience” if you’re not in a so-called top house. That’s not even a thing!! It’s subjective!! Please get a grip. Srats were literally created to bring women together, and y’all are losing the OG intent. I hope the next group of PNMs does better <3