If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Cold Taker

Poster Message:
I don’t agree with this. Top 3 still maintain a stronghold and here’s why. These houses do take OOS girls and the myth they don’t is inaccurate. Right now they don’t take as many girls overall because they can’t in order to raise the other 9 houses’ numbers. This year these 3 top houses took 50-75 fewer girls in recruitment. PiPhi maybe a few more but you get the idea. OOS girls retention rates at the university are lower. They get homesick, transfer and graduate early due to cost savings leaving spaces to fill. Definitely not all of them but much more likely. Thats why KD, a good house, had the 2nd largest pc this year. Long term retention is the problem and these other 9 houses have to work harder year round to keep their girls. Is it fair? Nope. Do they have great girls? ABSOLUTELY. They all do. I do agree XO has a problem with too many legacies. Alums way past their prime are running the chapter and the “top of the hill’ attitude is geographic only at this point as far as students on campus are concerned. KKG and PiPhi don’t care as much about legacies. Does it matter? Yes. But they will release you. I wonder what OOS percentages are for each house. Since you seem to be in the know, hot taker, do you have those stats? Genuinely curious.