"tiers"?

tiers are just someones opinion on who they think is the best and the worst. theres no set tiers and they're all based on someones preference which everyone has a different one. ignore them.

Tiers are just opinions and everyone's got one. If you read the comments on here you'll see that opinions vary widely. There seems to be a new realization this year that I haven't seen in the past about the value of tradition. The girls in some "old row" houses and a lot of alumnae put those old row houses first and say it's always been like that and isn't going to change. Lots of new oos girls and girls from less preferred zip codes are going to other houses, though, and those houses are now rising. If you overlook that some moribund old ladies are ranking up old row houses, you'll find that the current sentiment is much more centered on whether the houses got outstanding girls, not whether they did during the 1950s.

as put on this site are self ranking by sororities that aren't really good who are ranking themselves higher than they really are and then they put long standing houses that are better than them love

Not always. I give credit where credit is due and I have written several five-star posts for other houses who deserve recognition. A few have been answered with accusations of self-ranking.

Surely we have all seen things on campus which would shock everyone but which others have a hard time believing, not having seen it themselves.

So basically nothing on this site is truth --- it's only opinions