Sorority Retention & Sisterhood

Pi phi, AZD and aephi are totally underrated. They are outstanding chapters and this site is inaccurate.

We all know who’s overrated on here and runs the board.

the hater posts nonstop to make zeta look bad every day

2025 UCF Greek Achievement Awards

Multiple: Alpha Delta Pi, Delta Delta Delta, Chi Omega

One: Kappa Delta, Alpha Xi Delta, Alpha Epsilon Phi, Gamma Phi Beta

Only Zeta can make Zeta look bad. This is actual data.

Best:
Alpha delta pi - 32 (great)
Chi omega - 31 (underrated bc of socials)
Pi phi - 29 (great)
Alpha xi delta - 27 (great)

Great:
Kappa kappa gamma - 25 (underrated bc of socials)
Aephi - 23 (underrated bc of pairs)

Dangerously Low:
Zeta tau alpha - 7 (overrated because they can’t retain members and they rig the ranks on this site)

This is not credible data there are no drop numbers.

Where’s your credible diversity and looks data? Ah, right, all in your head because zeta ain’t anymore diverse and certainly ain’t prettier than any other chapter.

you are 100% correct. i don't have a dog in this fight but for the sake of using math right, this is all a big oversimplification. chapter xyz might graduate 40 girls in the spring but maybe they had 20 sophomores drop that year.

you also need to look at grads as a percentage of total membership. if chapter abc has 100 girls and they graduate 15, that means something different than a chapter who has 150 girls with 15 graduating.

too many other factors. we could go on and on.

Exactly. You graduated 7 and that was like 20% of your active roster! Glad you cracked the code there.

Spring is always the highest. And if it wasn’t, then the other chapters wouldn’t have been SO MUCH higher. There shouldn’t be a dramatic disparity by comparison against your peers. Try again.

Bumping

the point is we're dealing with super incomplete data. but yes, some of the chapters listed here as underrated deserve more credit. as far as saying some of them are overrated, i'm trying to focus on positives and not getting in the middle of that argument. lol

imo extra credit is due here to our smaller chapters that have a good number of girls staying until graduation relative to their chapter size. looking at grads as a percentage of overall membership rather than a raw number is a better indicator of "success" in that case. some chapters differ widely in size. ofsl data is outdated, so makes it hard.

literally 610 >>> 90

Big man throws a temper tantrum and fakes likes on his own posts

exactly, but she’ll keep camping as if ppl agree w her

7 spring graduates so that means graduate numbers don’t matter? Girl, pls, take the L. No one else had a problem with sprint graduate #s

Where’s the data on diversity and looks? You got lots to say about data sources so show your data.

This site is all Zeta ranks. Their girls aren’t any more diverse or prettier than 5 other chapters but those 5 other chapters obviously have something going on with sisterhood if their members are staying through graduation.

Retention is more available than diversity and looks.

We know your motive. You’re inflating bs and subjective categories to try to make your chapter look good because no one picks ur chapter and if they do no one stays through graduation. If the data isn’t good for your chapter, you just won’t include it. Pathetic.

Our motive??? Accuracy. You wouldn’t understand. We are all tired of you placing your chapter so high and above our chapters that are far better. You make this site a joke and you camp on here.

We all see. We all know your chapter. You are so embarrassing.

Keep camping.

Show your data on looks and diversity then? What proves the looks and diversity ranking? Your personal review of IG pages of 20% of each chapter? K k. Keep camping.

Show the looks data. Show the diversity data. Show it or remove it.