no top or upper chapters are

tops and uppers give input on lower chapters we all know where chapters stand. it could be anyone and if i had to guess it would be tops and uppers.

People are disliking bc they don’t agree. 🤷🏼‍♀️ U may think certain chapters earned their rank but clearly a lot don’t agree. I’d say just ignore it it’ll die down.

we dislike things we don’t agree with. there’s are many people on this site.

we think we figured it out

What is there to “figure out”? You think you cracked the code that of course a top tier chapter would agree w the ranking system the way it is and ignoring all of the chapter achievements and university recognitions?

Tier Considerations:
Campus relevance, strong membership & retention, new member class, looks, personality, social life, philanthropy events, srat & frat relations, Greek involvement, diversity, remaining in good standing with ofsl, house/no house.
(Not gpa or athletics, we’re social/philanthropic organizations, not academic or sports teams)

Ranking Bias:
Ranks are how chapters are viewed by the majority of Greeks and created with group input. If you believe a chapter is falling or rising comment below concrete reasons, for group discussion. Ranks are not set in stone and fluctuate with new pcs and for various reasons.

Reputation: 

Popularity/Socials:
Followers:

Diversity:

Leadership:

Involvement: 

Comp Wins: 

Event:

Social Life:

Looks:

kd and zta are ranked above adpi bc of popularity and events but adpi is miles above in leadership and rep and awards, just like chi o and theta achieve more than the upper mids.

pnms want to know about popularity and performance. aephi isn’t as popular but always has the highest gpa. ranks are mostly about looks and socials.