If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Interesting…

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />AXiD & Theta true mid / ChiO, AEPhi & KKG low mid !!<br /><br /> Poster Message:
Mids pair with mids and mix with mids. Theta & AXiD share the same socials Both had Sigma Chi & Theta Chi( They would never pair) Both have ZBT. (They would pair with AXiD but not Theta so put AXID > Theta) Both paired with DSig. Both look about the same and have the exact same socials. Chi O & AEPhi have the exact same socials but don’t have all mids/ better mids. Theta & AXiD have the better mids while Chi O & AEPhi have the lessed mids. Fiji & TKE. DSig & SAE have socials with top(s) Do u see how ridiculous this is? It’s not that black and white. True mids are just true mid. Can be for whatever reason. Lower mids are less popular than true mids. Can be for whatever reason. It’s not bc they “pair with this” and “have socials with that” yah that helps but sometimes it’s more complicated. So by ur logic our ranks should be KD, ZTA, ADPI DDD, PIPHI AXID, THETA CHI O, AEPHI KKG DZ GPHI Since it’s about pairs and socials. Acid and Theta share a pair and social. KKG should be the lowest lower mid since they are housed and have similar socials to ChiO & AEPhi. The top true mids DSig & SAE desire AXiD & Theta not Chi O & APhi. Axid was fought over by TRUE MIDS. See how it isn’t that black and white.