If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Wap

Poster Message:
I don’t disagree that IFC and Panhel created this situation, but acting like that means sorority presidents are just helpless bystanders is honestly insulting to people who were actually harmed. Leadership doesn’t disappear just because the system is corrupt. At some point, hiding behind “we had no choice” stops being an explanation and starts being a moral failure. I’ve been personally affected by a president’s decision to re-affiliate with a frat after SA concerns were raised. I watched leadership hear victims, acknowledge the harm, and then turn around and prioritize social relations anyway. That’s not IFC forcing their hand… that’s a choice. And telling girls who are “uncomfortable” to stay behind while everyone else goes isn’t neutral or protective; it isolates victims and gives frats exactly what they need to discredit them. I’ve seen that play out in real time, and it makes things worse. People are angry because this pattern repeats every year: presidents act out of fear of advisors, optics, and breaking the norm, then claim they’re victims of the system when they get called out. Meanwhile, safety is treated like a PR problem, criticism gets dismissed as drama, and accountability turns into TikTok clapbacks. Yes, IFC and Panhel deserve to be dragged. But leadership still means something. If someone isn’t willing to push back, take heat, or stand up for their members when it actually matters, they shouldn’t be in power. Full stop.