If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
fine its your death wish

Poster Message:
Explain the bias?” 😂 Easy. It isn’t even the ranking—it’s the way it’s written. The frats you like get “down to earth,” “great guys,” “best housing,” “great reputation,” while the ones you don’t like suddenly become “weird,” “odd,” “dress weird,” or “have egos.” That’s not an objective ranking, that’s your personal opinion leaking into every description. You also conveniently leave out chapters that are socially in the same tier or close enough that the difference is negligible because they don’t fit your narrative. If this was actually objective, every frat would be judged on the same things—parties, mixers, housing, sorority relations—not whether you personally vibe with the brothers. And making a “definitive” ranking in July is funny in itself. Anyone who’s actually been around JMU knows the social scene changes a ton between spring and fall. A lot of chapters are quiet in the spring, while others have a great semester that boosts their rep and sorority relations. Then fall rolls around and completely reshuffles things because that’s when the biggest darties, tailgates, rush, and social calendars happen. Judging next year’s rankings almost entirely off one spring semester is wild. You’ve been lurking this sub so long you started confusing your friend group’s opinions with the entire campus. Just call it “my favorite frats” next time and it’d make a lot more sense.